MCQ Collection
japan-bar-short-answer MCQs
Practice japan-bar-short-answer questions with answers and explanations.
Choose an option to check your answer.
Correct Answer: D. Failure to act can create liability where the person had a legally recognised duty and ability to act
Explanation:
Omission liability rests on a specific duty and capacity to intervene.
Choose an option to check your answer.
Correct Answer: D. Failure to act can create liability where the person had a legally recognised duty and ability to act
Explanation:
Omission liability rests on a specific duty and capacity to intervene.
Choose an option to check your answer.
Correct Answer: C. Intentional killing requires proof of the conduct, death, causation and the required mental state
Explanation:
Homicide analysis combines conduct, result, causation and mens rea.
Choose an option to check your answer.
Correct Answer: A. Intentional killing requires proof of the conduct, death, causation and the required mental state
Explanation:
Homicide analysis combines conduct, result, causation and mens rea.
Choose an option to check your answer.
Correct Answer: C. Intentional killing requires proof of the conduct, death, causation and the required mental state
Explanation:
Homicide analysis combines conduct, result, causation and mens rea.
Choose an option to check your answer.
Correct Answer: B. Result offences require a legally sufficient causal link between conduct and the prohibited result
Explanation:
Criminal causation links the actor’s conduct to the result.
Choose an option to check your answer.
Correct Answer: A. Defence against an imminent unlawful attack must satisfy necessity and proportionality requirements
Explanation:
Self-defence responds to an imminent unlawful threat.
Choose an option to check your answer.
Correct Answer: B. Defence against an imminent unlawful attack must satisfy necessity and proportionality requirements
Explanation:
Self-defence responds to an imminent unlawful threat.
Choose an option to check your answer.
Correct Answer: D. Defence against an imminent unlawful attack must satisfy necessity and proportionality requirements
Explanation:
Self-defence responds to an imminent unlawful threat.
Choose an option to check your answer.
Correct Answer: D. Necessity may justify conduct used to avert an imminent danger when the legal balancing conditions are satisfied
Explanation:
Necessity addresses emergency harm avoidance.
Choose an option to check your answer.
Correct Answer: D. Necessity may justify conduct used to avert an imminent danger when the legal balancing conditions are satisfied
Explanation:
Necessity addresses emergency harm avoidance.
Choose an option to check your answer.
Correct Answer: B. Necessity may justify conduct used to avert an imminent danger when the legal balancing conditions are satisfied
Explanation:
Necessity addresses emergency harm avoidance.