MCQ Collection

Cognitive and analytical reasoning MCQs

Practice Cognitive and analytical reasoning questions with answers and explanations.

Reasoning scenario 9: An Australian public-sector team is preparing advice, allocating resources or responding to a workplace issue. The setting is a policy branch. Analyst Q7 finishes before Analyst R8, and Analyst R8 before Analyst S0. Which statement must be true?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 11: An Australian public-sector team is preparing advice, allocating resources or responding to a workplace issue. The setting is a regulatory unit. All dorins are jovins. No jovin is a merek. Which conclusion follows?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 12: An Australian public-sector team is preparing advice, allocating resources or responding to a workplace issue. The setting is a programme evaluation office. A programme evaluation unit proposes a change to reduce missed client appointments. Which evidence is most relevant?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 13: An Australian public-sector team is preparing advice, allocating resources or responding to a workplace issue. The setting is a policy branch. A review pool has 17 approved and 35 unapproved files. What is the probability a random file is approved?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 14: An Australian public-sector team is preparing advice, allocating resources or responding to a workplace issue. The setting is a service-delivery team. Which claim about a public service office contains an unwarranted generalisation?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 1: An Australian public-sector team is preparing advice, allocating resources or responding to a workplace issue. The setting is a policy branch. Analyst I8 finishes before Analyst J0, and Analyst J0 before Analyst K1. Which statement must be true?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 3: An Australian public-sector team is preparing advice, allocating resources or responding to a workplace issue. The setting is a regulatory unit. All farens are mereks. No merek is a pelan. Which conclusion follows?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 4: An Australian public-sector team is preparing advice, allocating resources or responding to a workplace issue. The setting is a programme evaluation office. A programme evaluation unit proposes a change to reduce missed client appointments. Which evidence is most relevant?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 5: An Australian public-sector team is preparing advice, allocating resources or responding to a workplace issue. The setting is a policy branch. A review pool has 9 approved and 11 unapproved files. What is the probability a random file is approved?

Choose an option to check your answer.