MCQ Collection

Critical Reasoning MCQs

Practice Critical Reasoning questions with answers and explanations.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 123: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a research planning exercise. All farens are mereks. No merek is a pelan. Which conclusion follows?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 124: Before reviewing the calculation method, a service improvement unit examines this version. An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is an international programme evaluation. A university research office proposes a change to reduce missed enrolment interviews. Which evidence is most relevant?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 125: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a campus sustainability study. A review pool has 26 approved and 30 unapproved files. What is the probability a random file is approved?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 126: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a student-services review. Which claim about a campus service contains an unwarranted generalisation?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 112: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is an international programme evaluation. In reasoning case 112, evidence supports a claim only when the sample is representative. Which assumption is being tested?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 113: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a campus sustainability study. Analyst O6 finishes before Analyst P7, and Analyst P7 before Analyst Q8. Which statement must be true?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 115: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a research planning exercise. All sovins are pelans. No pelan is a jovin. Which conclusion follows?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 116: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is an international programme evaluation. A university research office proposes a change to reduce missed enrolment interviews. Which evidence is most relevant?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 117: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a campus sustainability study. A review pool has 18 approved and 35 unapproved files. What is the probability a random file is approved?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 118: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a student-services review. Which claim about a campus service contains an unwarranted generalisation?

Choose an option to check your answer.