Management reasoning item 146: Enter 30% of 340.
Correct Answer: 102
Explanation:
Convert 30% to 30/100 and multiply by 340, giving 102.0.
MCQ Collection
Management Comprehensive Ability MCQs
Practice Management Comprehensive Ability questions with answers and explanations.
Management reasoning item 147: In a business-school admissions case, all analysts are readers and some readers are planners. Which conclusion is logically valid?
Choose an option to check your answer.
Correct Answer: D. All analysts are readers, and some readers are planners; it does not follow that all analysts are planners
Explanation:
The premises establish analyst→reader and the existence of reader-planners, but do not connect those planners to every analyst.
Management reasoning item 148: A three-period table reports 102, 134 and 166 cases. Enter the total.
Correct Answer: 402
Explanation:
Add all three reported values: 102+134+166=402.
Management reasoning item 149: A report using operational evidence finds two variables rise together. Which interpretation is most careful?
Choose an option to check your answer.
Correct Answer: C. The evidence supports correlation but does not by itself establish causation
Explanation:
Association alone cannot rule out confounding, reverse direction or chance; causal inference requires stronger design and evidence.
Management reasoning item 150: A record in a business-school admissions case conflicts with a submitted document. Which first step best supports a management recommendation?
Choose an option to check your answer.
Correct Answer: C. Verify the rule, document the facts and use the authorised escalation channel
Explanation:
A defensible response preserves evidence, verifies authority and uses the proper review route before changing a record.
Management reasoning item 143: Choose the word that best completes the sentence: A recommendation should be supported by verifiable ____.
Choose an option to check your answer.
Correct Answer: C. evidence
Explanation:
Evidence is the relevant basis for a defensible recommendation; the other options cannot substantiate a claim.
Management reasoning item 138: Enter 25% of 330.
Correct Answer: 82.5
Explanation:
Convert 25% to 25/100 and multiply by 330, giving 82.5.
Management reasoning item 139: In a business-school admissions case, all analysts are readers and some readers are planners. Which conclusion is logically valid?
Choose an option to check your answer.
Correct Answer: D. All analysts are readers, and some readers are planners; it does not follow that all analysts are planners
Explanation:
The premises establish analyst→reader and the existence of reader-planners, but do not connect those planners to every analyst.
Management reasoning item 140: A three-period table reports 101, 132 and 163 cases. Enter the total.
Correct Answer: 396
Explanation:
Add all three reported values: 101+132+163=396.
Management reasoning item 141: A report using operational evidence finds two variables rise together. Which interpretation is most careful?
Choose an option to check your answer.
Correct Answer: A. The evidence supports correlation but does not by itself establish causation
Explanation:
Association alone cannot rule out confounding, reverse direction or chance; causal inference requires stronger design and evidence.
Management reasoning item 142: A record in a business-school admissions case conflicts with a submitted document. Which first step best supports a management recommendation?
Choose an option to check your answer.
Correct Answer: A. Verify the rule, document the facts and use the authorised escalation channel
Explanation:
A defensible response preserves evidence, verifies authority and uses the proper review route before changing a record.
Management reasoning item 131: In a business-school admissions case, all analysts are readers and some readers are planners. Which conclusion is logically valid?
Choose an option to check your answer.
Correct Answer: D. All analysts are readers, and some readers are planners; it does not follow that all analysts are planners
Explanation:
The premises establish analyst→reader and the existence of reader-planners, but do not connect those planners to every analyst.