MCQ Collection

Australia MCQs

Practice Australia questions with answers and explanations.

aps-role-assessmentCognitive and analytical reasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 37: An Australian public-sector team is preparing advice, allocating resources or responding to a workplace issue. The setting is a policy branch. A review pool has 18 approved and 20 unapproved files. What is the probability a random file is approved?

Choose an option to check your answer.

aps-role-assessmentCognitive and analytical reasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 38: An Australian public-sector team is preparing advice, allocating resources or responding to a workplace issue. The setting is a service-delivery team. Which claim about a public service office contains an unwarranted generalisation?

Choose an option to check your answer.

aps-role-assessmentCognitive and analytical reasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 40: An Australian public-sector team is preparing advice, allocating resources or responding to a workplace issue. The setting is a programme evaluation office. In reasoning case 40, evidence supports a claim only when the sample is representative. Which assumption is being tested?

Choose an option to check your answer.

aps-role-assessmentCognitive and analytical reasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 41: An Australian public-sector team is preparing advice, allocating resources or responding to a workplace issue. The setting is a policy branch. Analyst W3 finishes before Analyst X4, and Analyst X4 before Analyst Y5. Which statement must be true?

Choose an option to check your answer.

aps-role-assessmentCognitive and analytical reasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 43: An Australian public-sector team is preparing advice, allocating resources or responding to a workplace issue. The setting is a regulatory unit. All sovins are pelans. No pelan is a jovin. Which conclusion follows?

Choose an option to check your answer.

aps-role-assessmentCognitive and analytical reasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 30: An Australian public-sector team is preparing advice, allocating resources or responding to a workplace issue. The setting is a service-delivery team. Which claim about a public service office contains an unwarranted generalisation?

Choose an option to check your answer.

aps-role-assessmentCognitive and analytical reasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 32: An Australian public-sector team is preparing advice, allocating resources or responding to a workplace issue. The setting is a programme evaluation office. In reasoning case 32, evidence supports a claim only when the sample is representative. Which assumption is being tested?

Choose an option to check your answer.

aps-role-assessmentCognitive and analytical reasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 33: An Australian public-sector team is preparing advice, allocating resources or responding to a workplace issue. The setting is a policy branch. Analyst O4 finishes before Analyst P5, and Analyst P5 before Analyst Q6. Which statement must be true?

Choose an option to check your answer.