MCQ Collection

Australia MCQs

Practice Australia questions with answers and explanations.

aps-role-assessmentCognitive and analytical reasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 35: An Australian public-sector team is preparing advice, allocating resources or responding to a workplace issue. The setting is a regulatory unit. All dorins are jovins. No jovin is a merek. Which conclusion follows?

Choose an option to check your answer.

aps-role-assessmentCognitive and analytical reasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 28: An Australian public-sector team is preparing advice, allocating resources or responding to a workplace issue. The setting is a programme evaluation office. A programme evaluation unit proposes a change to reduce missed client appointments. Which evidence is most relevant?

Choose an option to check your answer.

aps-role-assessmentCognitive and analytical reasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 29: An Australian public-sector team is preparing advice, allocating resources or responding to a workplace issue. The setting is a policy branch. A review pool has 10 approved and 25 unapproved files. What is the probability a random file is approved?

Choose an option to check your answer.

aps-role-assessmentCognitive and analytical reasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 17: An Australian public-sector team is preparing advice, allocating resources or responding to a workplace issue. The setting is a policy branch. Analyst Y6 finishes before Analyst Z7, and Analyst Z7 before Analyst A8. Which statement must be true?

Choose an option to check your answer.

aps-role-assessmentCognitive and analytical reasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 19: An Australian public-sector team is preparing advice, allocating resources or responding to a workplace issue. The setting is a regulatory unit. All sovins are pelans. No pelan is a jovin. Which conclusion follows?

Choose an option to check your answer.

aps-role-assessmentCognitive and analytical reasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 20: An Australian public-sector team is preparing advice, allocating resources or responding to a workplace issue. The setting is a programme evaluation office. A programme evaluation unit proposes a change to reduce missed client appointments. Which evidence is most relevant?

Choose an option to check your answer.

aps-role-assessmentCognitive and analytical reasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 21: An Australian public-sector team is preparing advice, allocating resources or responding to a workplace issue. The setting is a policy branch. A review pool has 25 approved and 30 unapproved files. What is the probability a random file is approved?

Choose an option to check your answer.

aps-role-assessmentCognitive and analytical reasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 22: Before preparing feedback for the next cohort, a safety and quality team examines this version. An Australian public-sector team is preparing advice, allocating resources or responding to a workplace issue. The setting is a service-delivery team. Which claim about a public service office contains an unwarranted generalisation?

Choose an option to check your answer.

aps-role-assessmentCognitive and analytical reasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 24: An Australian public-sector team is preparing advice, allocating resources or responding to a workplace issue. The setting is a programme evaluation office. In reasoning case 24, evidence supports a claim only when the sample is representative. Which assumption is being tested?

Choose an option to check your answer.

aps-role-assessmentCognitive and analytical reasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 25: An Australian public-sector team is preparing advice, allocating resources or responding to a workplace issue. The setting is a policy branch. Analyst G5 finishes before Analyst H6, and Analyst H6 before Analyst I7. Which statement must be true?

Choose an option to check your answer.