MCQ Collection

isat-integrated-reasoning MCQs

Practice isat-integrated-reasoning questions with answers and explanations.

Reasoning scenario 3: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a research planning exercise. All farens are mereks. No merek is a pelan. Which conclusion follows?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 4: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is an international programme evaluation. A university research office proposes a change to reduce missed enrolment interviews. Which evidence is most relevant?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 5: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a campus sustainability study. A review pool has 21 approved and 18 unapproved files. What is the probability a random file is approved?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 6: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a student-services review. Which claim about a campus service contains an unwarranted generalisation?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 8: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is an international programme evaluation. In reasoning case 8, evidence supports a claim only when the sample is representative. Which assumption is being tested?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 9: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a campus sustainability study. Analyst O1 finishes before Analyst P2, and Analyst P2 before Analyst Q3. Which statement must be true?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 11: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a research planning exercise. All dorins are jovins. No jovin is a merek. Which conclusion follows?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 1: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a campus sustainability study. Analyst G2 finishes before Analyst H3, and Analyst H3 before Analyst I4. Which statement must be true?

Choose an option to check your answer.