MCQ Collection

isat-integrated-reasoning MCQs

Practice isat-integrated-reasoning questions with answers and explanations.

Reasoning scenario 35: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a research planning exercise. All dorins are jovins. No jovin is a merek. Which conclusion follows?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 32: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is an international programme evaluation. In reasoning case 32, evidence supports a claim only when the sample is representative. Which assumption is being tested?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 33: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a campus sustainability study. Analyst M7 finishes before Analyst N8, and Analyst N8 before Analyst O0. Which statement must be true?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 24: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is an international programme evaluation. In reasoning case 24, evidence supports a claim only when the sample is representative. Which assumption is being tested?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 25: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a campus sustainability study. Analyst E8 finishes before Analyst F0, and Analyst F0 before Analyst G1. Which statement must be true?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 27: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a research planning exercise. All farens are mereks. No merek is a pelan. Which conclusion follows?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 28: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is an international programme evaluation. A university research office proposes a change to reduce missed enrolment interviews. Which evidence is most relevant?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 29: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a campus sustainability study. A review pool has 22 approved and 32 unapproved files. What is the probability a random file is approved?

Choose an option to check your answer.