MCQ Collection

isat-integrated-reasoning MCQs

Practice isat-integrated-reasoning questions with answers and explanations.

Reasoning scenario 53: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a campus sustainability study. A review pool has 23 approved and 17 unapproved files. What is the probability a random file is approved?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 43: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a research planning exercise. All sovins are pelans. No pelan is a jovin. Which conclusion follows?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 44: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is an international programme evaluation. A university research office proposes a change to reduce missed enrolment interviews. Which evidence is most relevant?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 45: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a campus sustainability study. A review pool has 15 approved and 22 unapproved files. What is the probability a random file is approved?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 46: Before preparing feedback for the next cohort, a safety and quality team examines this version. An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a student-services review. Which claim about a campus service contains an unwarranted generalisation?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 36: Before reviewing the calculation method, a service improvement unit examines this version. An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is an international programme evaluation. A university research office proposes a change to reduce missed enrolment interviews. Which evidence is most relevant?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 37: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a campus sustainability study. A review pool has 7 approved and 27 unapproved files. What is the probability a random file is approved?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 38: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a student-services review. Which claim about a campus service contains an unwarranted generalisation?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 39: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a research planning exercise. If independent events have probabilities 60/100 and 25/100, what is the probability both occur?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 40: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is an international programme evaluation. In reasoning case 40, evidence supports a claim only when the sample is representative. Which assumption is being tested?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 41: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a campus sustainability study. Analyst U6 finishes before Analyst V7, and Analyst V7 before Analyst W8. Which statement must be true?

Choose an option to check your answer.