MCQ Collection

Critical Reasoning MCQs

Practice Critical Reasoning questions with answers and explanations.

Reasoning scenario 86: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a student-services review. Which claim about a campus service contains an unwarranted generalisation?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 88: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is an international programme evaluation. In reasoning case 88, evidence supports a claim only when the sample is representative. Which assumption is being tested?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 89: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a campus sustainability study. Analyst Q0 finishes before Analyst R1, and Analyst R1 before Analyst S2. Which statement must be true?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 91: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a research planning exercise. All sovins are pelans. No pelan is a jovin. Which conclusion follows?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 92: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is an international programme evaluation. A university research office proposes a change to reduce missed enrolment interviews. Which evidence is most relevant?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 93: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a campus sustainability study. A review pool has 17 approved and 21 unapproved files. What is the probability a random file is approved?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 80: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is an international programme evaluation. In reasoning case 80, evidence supports a claim only when the sample is representative. Which assumption is being tested?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 81: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a campus sustainability study. Analyst I1 finishes before Analyst J2, and Analyst J2 before Analyst K3. Which statement must be true?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 72: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is an international programme evaluation. In reasoning case 72, evidence supports a claim only when the sample is representative. Which assumption is being tested?

Choose an option to check your answer.