MCQ Collection

Critical Reasoning MCQs

Practice Critical Reasoning questions with answers and explanations.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 73: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a campus sustainability study. Analyst A2 finishes before Analyst B3, and Analyst B3 before Analyst C4. Which statement must be true?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 75: Before moderating the worked solution, a curriculum moderation team examines this version. An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a research planning exercise. All farens are mereks. No merek is a pelan. Which conclusion follows?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 76: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is an international programme evaluation. A university research office proposes a change to reduce missed enrolment interviews. Which evidence is most relevant?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 77: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a campus sustainability study. A review pool has 24 approved and 31 unapproved files. What is the probability a random file is approved?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 78: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a student-services review. Which claim about a campus service contains an unwarranted generalisation?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 65: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a campus sustainability study. Analyst S3 finishes before Analyst T4, and Analyst T4 before Analyst U5. Which statement must be true?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 67: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a research planning exercise. All sovins are pelans. No pelan is a jovin. Which conclusion follows?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 68: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is an international programme evaluation. A university research office proposes a change to reduce missed enrolment interviews. Which evidence is most relevant?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 69: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a campus sustainability study. A review pool has 16 approved and 7 unapproved files. What is the probability a random file is approved?

Choose an option to check your answer.