MCQ Collection

Critical Reasoning MCQs

Practice Critical Reasoning questions with answers and explanations.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 48: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is an international programme evaluation. In reasoning case 48, evidence supports a claim only when the sample is representative. Which assumption is being tested?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 49: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a campus sustainability study. Analyst C5 finishes before Analyst D6, and Analyst D6 before Analyst E7. Which statement must be true?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 51: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a research planning exercise. All farens are mereks. No merek is a pelan. Which conclusion follows?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 52: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is an international programme evaluation. A university research office proposes a change to reduce missed enrolment interviews. Which evidence is most relevant?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 53: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a campus sustainability study. A review pool has 23 approved and 17 unapproved files. What is the probability a random file is approved?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 43: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a research planning exercise. All sovins are pelans. No pelan is a jovin. Which conclusion follows?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 44: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is an international programme evaluation. A university research office proposes a change to reduce missed enrolment interviews. Which evidence is most relevant?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 45: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a campus sustainability study. A review pool has 15 approved and 22 unapproved files. What is the probability a random file is approved?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 46: Before preparing feedback for the next cohort, a safety and quality team examines this version. An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a student-services review. Which claim about a campus service contains an unwarranted generalisation?

Choose an option to check your answer.