MCQ Collection

Critical Reasoning MCQs

Practice Critical Reasoning questions with answers and explanations.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 24: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is an international programme evaluation. In reasoning case 24, evidence supports a claim only when the sample is representative. Which assumption is being tested?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 25: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a campus sustainability study. Analyst E8 finishes before Analyst F0, and Analyst F0 before Analyst G1. Which statement must be true?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 27: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a research planning exercise. All farens are mereks. No merek is a pelan. Which conclusion follows?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 28: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is an international programme evaluation. A university research office proposes a change to reduce missed enrolment interviews. Which evidence is most relevant?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 29: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a campus sustainability study. A review pool has 22 approved and 32 unapproved files. What is the probability a random file is approved?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 30: Before preparing feedback for the next cohort, a safety and quality team examines this version. An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a student-services review. Which claim about a campus service contains an unwarranted generalisation?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 16: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is an international programme evaluation. In reasoning case 16, evidence supports a claim only when the sample is representative. Which assumption is being tested?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 17: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a campus sustainability study. Analyst W0 finishes before Analyst X1, and Analyst X1 before Analyst Y2. Which statement must be true?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 19: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a research planning exercise. All sovins are pelans. No pelan is a jovin. Which conclusion follows?

Choose an option to check your answer.