MCQ Collection

Critical Reasoning MCQs

Practice Critical Reasoning questions with answers and explanations.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 36: Before reviewing the calculation method, a service improvement unit examines this version. An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is an international programme evaluation. A university research office proposes a change to reduce missed enrolment interviews. Which evidence is most relevant?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 37: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a campus sustainability study. A review pool has 7 approved and 27 unapproved files. What is the probability a random file is approved?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 38: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a student-services review. Which claim about a campus service contains an unwarranted generalisation?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 39: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a research planning exercise. If independent events have probabilities 60/100 and 25/100, what is the probability both occur?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 40: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is an international programme evaluation. In reasoning case 40, evidence supports a claim only when the sample is representative. Which assumption is being tested?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 41: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a campus sustainability study. Analyst U6 finishes before Analyst V7, and Analyst V7 before Analyst W8. Which statement must be true?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 35: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a research planning exercise. All dorins are jovins. No jovin is a merek. Which conclusion follows?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 32: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is an international programme evaluation. In reasoning case 32, evidence supports a claim only when the sample is representative. Which assumption is being tested?

Choose an option to check your answer.

isat-integrated-reasoningCritical ReasoningAustraliaMedium

Reasoning scenario 33: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a campus sustainability study. Analyst M7 finishes before Analyst N8, and Analyst N8 before Analyst O0. Which statement must be true?

Choose an option to check your answer.