MCQ Collection
Critical Reasoning MCQs
Practice Critical Reasoning questions with answers and explanations.
Choose an option to check your answer.
Correct Answer: C. A controlled comparison of missed enrolment interviews before and after similar implementations.
Explanation:
Direct comparative outcome evidence evaluates the claim.
Choose an option to check your answer.
Correct Answer: C. 14/22
Explanation:
Probability is approved divided by total.
Choose an option to check your answer.
Correct Answer: B. Two services were delayed today, so every service is always delayed.
Explanation:
Two observations cannot justify an absolute universal claim.
Choose an option to check your answer.
Correct Answer: B. A controlled comparison of missed enrolment interviews before and after similar implementations.
Explanation:
Direct comparative outcome evidence evaluates the claim.
Choose an option to check your answer.
Correct Answer: D. 6/19
Explanation:
Probability is approved divided by total.
Choose an option to check your answer.
Correct Answer: B. Two services were delayed today, so every service is always delayed.
Explanation:
Two observations cannot justify an absolute universal claim.
Choose an option to check your answer.
Correct Answer: D. 0.1836
Explanation:
Multiply independent probabilities.
Choose an option to check your answer.
Correct Answer: A. 50
Explanation:
31+34−15=50.
Choose an option to check your answer.
Correct Answer: A. No faren is a pelan.
Explanation:
Class inclusion and exclusion imply the conclusion.
Choose an option to check your answer.
Correct Answer: B. A controlled comparison of missed enrolment interviews before and after similar implementations.
Explanation:
Direct comparative outcome evidence evaluates the claim.
Choose an option to check your answer.
Correct Answer: A. 21/39
Explanation:
Probability is approved divided by total.
Choose an option to check your answer.
Correct Answer: C. Two services were delayed today, so every service is always delayed.
Explanation:
Two observations cannot justify an absolute universal claim.