MCQ Collection

isat-integrated-reasoning MCQs

Practice isat-integrated-reasoning questions with answers and explanations.

Reasoning scenario 105: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a campus sustainability study. Analyst G7 finishes before Analyst H8, and Analyst H8 before Analyst I0. Which statement must be true?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 94: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a student-services review. Which claim about a campus service contains an unwarranted generalisation?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 83: Before moderating the worked solution, a curriculum moderation team examines this version. An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a research planning exercise. All dorins are jovins. No jovin is a merek. Which conclusion follows?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 84: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is an international programme evaluation. A university research office proposes a change to reduce missed enrolment interviews. Which evidence is most relevant?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 85: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a campus sustainability study. A review pool has 9 approved and 26 unapproved files. What is the probability a random file is approved?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 86: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a student-services review. Which claim about a campus service contains an unwarranted generalisation?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 88: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is an international programme evaluation. In reasoning case 88, evidence supports a claim only when the sample is representative. Which assumption is being tested?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 89: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a campus sustainability study. Analyst Q0 finishes before Analyst R1, and Analyst R1 before Analyst S2. Which statement must be true?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 91: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a research planning exercise. All sovins are pelans. No pelan is a jovin. Which conclusion follows?

Choose an option to check your answer.