MCQ Collection

isat-integrated-reasoning MCQs

Practice isat-integrated-reasoning questions with answers and explanations.

Reasoning scenario 92: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is an international programme evaluation. A university research office proposes a change to reduce missed enrolment interviews. Which evidence is most relevant?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 93: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a campus sustainability study. A review pool has 17 approved and 21 unapproved files. What is the probability a random file is approved?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 80: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is an international programme evaluation. In reasoning case 80, evidence supports a claim only when the sample is representative. Which assumption is being tested?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 81: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a campus sustainability study. Analyst I1 finishes before Analyst J2, and Analyst J2 before Analyst K3. Which statement must be true?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 72: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is an international programme evaluation. In reasoning case 72, evidence supports a claim only when the sample is representative. Which assumption is being tested?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 73: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a campus sustainability study. Analyst A2 finishes before Analyst B3, and Analyst B3 before Analyst C4. Which statement must be true?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 75: Before moderating the worked solution, a curriculum moderation team examines this version. An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a research planning exercise. All farens are mereks. No merek is a pelan. Which conclusion follows?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 76: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is an international programme evaluation. A university research office proposes a change to reduce missed enrolment interviews. Which evidence is most relevant?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 77: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a campus sustainability study. A review pool has 24 approved and 31 unapproved files. What is the probability a random file is approved?

Choose an option to check your answer.

Reasoning scenario 78: An international university applicant is asked to integrate unfamiliar evidence and quantitative information. The setting is a student-services review. Which claim about a campus service contains an unwarranted generalisation?

Choose an option to check your answer.